|
1 Corinthians Lesson 8
Copyright 1999. John Creamer. All rights reserved. Questions: Have you ever accepted a job with Company B while you were
still employed by Company A? What is the commonly accepted protocol for an employee to
transition from his/her current employer to a new one? Are there times when a 2 week notice is not
appropriate? What are some of the strains that exist in the transition
period of a two week notice? What happens to allegiances and relationships within the
company during that time? Suppose a husband or wife announced to their mate they were
having an affair with someone else and offered to serve a 2 week
notice before leaving. How do you suppose the jilted partner would
respond to their offer? In Pauls letter to the believers at Corinth, he addressed
a problem that existed among them that, on the surface, might be dealt
with simply as an example of sexual immorality. As many Americans have
learned recently, however, the problem that effects everyone else around
is probably a much deeper issue of personal integrity and mixed allegiances.
Before we look at the problem, consider again the issues he has raised
with the Corinthians up to this point. They disagreed among themselves (1:10ff) over who was the
best person to have led them to ChristPaul?
Apollos?
Peter? Next, it appears they felt the need to spruce up the
gospel so that it would have a greater appeal (1:17-2:5), because
Paul meticulously explained why the foolishness of God is wiser
than man's wisdom, and the weakness of God is stronger than man's strength. Still early in the letter, Paul seems to indicate there
was another issue among them that was causing jealousy and quarreling
they
appeared to be categorizing peopleranking each other
according to some Spiritual Intelligence Quotientso
Paul gave them Gods ranking system (2:6-3:4): The man
without the Spirit; The man with the Spirit, and; The man they
most resembled
the man in Christ who acted like a baby! After assessing their spiritual condition, he explained
(3:10-3:17) that they, like a building, had a firm foundation in Jesus
Christ, but if they did not pay special attention to what they used to
build the rest of their structurei.e., if they did not work on maintaining
their spiritual conditioningthe fires of affliction in this life
and in the final judgment to come would reduce all of their building to
rubble. Although it seems their weaknesses should have been obvious
to them by now, it appears they were blinded to them and displayed instead
an air of spiritual superiority over Paul, apparently feeling qualified
to pass judgment on whether Paul had been faithful to God in his ministry!
Paul addresses their air of spiritual superiority (Chapter
4) by saying, Already you have become rich! You have become kings--and
that without us! How I wish that you really had become kings so that we
might be kings with you! We are fools for Christ, but you are so wise
in Christ! We are weak, but you are strong! You are honored, we are dishonored!
A few lines later, Paul reminded them, I am not writing this to
shame you, but to warn you, as my dear children
for in Christ Jesus
I became your father through the gospel. The Corinthians: like so many today
possessing obvious
weaknesses, yet deluding themselves into believing they were so righteous!
Now to the latest problem among them
their most obvious and flagrant
demonstration of spiritual impropriety to this point. (1 Corinthians 5:1 NIV) It is actually reported that
there is sexual immorality among you, and of a kind that does not occur
even among pagans: A man has his father's wife. {2} And you are proud!
Shouldn't you rather have been filled with grief and have put out of your
fellowship the man who did this? Paul said they had a problem of sexual immorality among
them. What is sexual immorality? What kind of violation is sexual immorality? Is it strictly
a religious violation or can it also be a social and/or civil violation?
What can be some of the bad side effects of sexual immorality
(or sexual misconduct)? Can you think of any examples of sexual immorality among
us today? Suppose someone doesnt have the slightest concern
for anything religious or spiritual in their lifedoes that make
sexual immorality O.K. for them? Why would sexual immorality in a church like the one in
Corinth
or in ours today
pose a problem? Now to the issue of the mans allegiance: Based on
his actions, why could someone challenge his allegiance to God? (His actions
were in direct disobedience to Gods will.) How did the believers in Corinth
these people with
an air of spiritual superiority
feel about this sexual
misconduct going on in their midst? (They were proud!) What did Paul say they should have felt instead of pride?
(Grief.) They were proud of what this man was doing! Something just
isnt right here. How could a group of people devoted to God be proud
of a mans ungodly actions? They cant. Even though they gave
lip service to their devotion to God, their pride in this man revealed
what really was in their hearta telltale sign of a shift in their
allegiance. Jesus addressed this duplicity that people
demonstrate
(Mark 7:6-7 NIV) He replied, "Isaiah
was right when he prophesied about you hypocrites; as it is written: "'These
people honor me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me. {7}
They worship me in vain; their teachings are but rules taught by men.' (Mark 7:20-23 NIV) He went on: "What
comes out of a man is what makes him 'unclean.' {21} For from within,
out of men's hearts, come evil thoughts, sexual immorality, theft, murder,
adultery, {22} greed, malice, deceit, lewdness, envy, slander, arrogance
and folly. {23} All these evils come from inside and make a man 'unclean.'" To whom did the people verbalize their allegiance in verses
6-7? (God.) But, what did Jesus say about their hearts? In verses 20-23, what did Jesus say the heart reveals? (Actions
which reveal allegiance evil thoughts, sexual immorality, theft,
murder, adultery, etc.) Going back to the Corinthians, what did their pride of this
mans immorality reveal about what was in their heart? (Their allegiance
was more to their sin nature than to God.) (1 Corinthians 5:3 NIV) Even though I am not physically
present, I am with you in spirit. And I have already passed judgment on
the one who did this, just as if I were present. Paul said that even though he was absent, he had already
passed judgment on this. How does this situation differ from those in
the previous lesson on judging others? (The situations in the previous
lesson were not black and white
this was
like a
dropped pass in football, it was obvious to everyone it was wrong and
was being flaunted.) {4} When you are assembled in the name of our Lord Jesus
and I am with you in spirit, and the power of our Lord Jesus is present,
{5} hand this man over to Satan, so that the sinful nature may be destroyed
and his spirit saved on the day of the Lord. What did Paul recommend they do? (Hand him over to Satan.) What did he say would happenboth good and bad? Re-read 1 Corinthians 3:12-15. Is this descriptive of what
Paul recommended? What would happen to his soul? {6} Your boasting is not good. Don't you know that a
little yeast works through the whole batch of dough? Even though it was one mans sin, Paul says their boasting
about it has implicated them in the evil, giving them an analogy of yeast
in bread. How much yeast does it take to work through a whole batch of
dough? (Perhaps another example of a little spoiling a lot would be too
many chile peppers in the pot of chili. A little bit can ruin a lot.) Paul was trying to explain in simple terms they could understand
that mans sin would impact them the same wayallowed to continue,
it would have negative impact on their entire fellowship. {7} Get rid of the old yeast that you may be a new batch
without yeast--as you really are. For Christ, our Passover lamb, has been
sacrificed. {8} Therefore let us keep the Festival, not with the old yeast,
the yeast of malice and wickedness, but with bread without yeast, the
bread of sincerity and truth. What did he say (v.8) the old yeast represented? When they rid themselves of the yeast of malice and wickedness,
what did he say would be the unleavened bread that would be
produced? (The bread of sincerity and truth.) IN OTHER WORDS
If
the Corinthians did not get rid of this man and woman, the yeast
of their allegiance to their sin nature would spread through all of them.
{9} I have written you in my letter not to associate
with sexually immoral people-- {10} not at all meaning the people of this
world who are immoral, or the greedy and swindlers, or idolaters. In that
case you would have to leave this world. Almost as if he knew they would take this advice and misuse
it or apply it wrongly, Paul clarifies again what he is saying about them
coming in contact with people involved in sexual immorality. Who does
he say this advice does not apply to? (Their contact with sexually immoral
people outside the body of Christ.) Is this hypocritical? (No. Since people outside the body
of Christ have not made a commitment to live by Gods will for their
life, sex is not wrong for them. Imagine a Christian trying to convince
a non-Christian he/she had sinned because they violated Gods will
for a Christian!) What happens when Christians disassociate themselves from
the immoral people outside the church? (They lose any potential ministry
with or to them.) {11} But now I am writing you that you must not associate
with anyone who calls himself a brother but is sexually immoral or greedy,
an idolater or a slanderer, a drunkard or a swindler. With such a man
do not even eat. Who does he say this does apply to? (Anyone who calls himself
a brother.) How did he say we should relate to anyone with these unresolved
issues in their life? Notice the church does not send a righteous mob to beat
up the sinners in their fellowship
they are simply instructed
to not associate with them. {12} What business is it of mine to judge those outside
the church? Are you not to judge those inside? {13} God will judge those
outside. "Expel the wicked man from among you." How would you summarize the points in Pauls closing
argument? (In effect, Paul said, We are not responsible for the
allegiances of the people who are not on Gods team, but wed
better be concerned about the allegiances of those who are. If they are
loyal to the other side, then we need to get rid of them a.s.a.p. or their
corruption will spread through the whole team.) (Hebrews 3:12-14 NIV) See to it, brothers, that none
of you has a sinful, unbelieving heart that turns away from the living
God. {13} But encourage one another daily, as long as it is called Today,
so that none of you may be hardened by sin's deceitfulness. {14} We have
come to share in Christ if we hold firmly till the end the confidence
we had at first. Many think that once they are on the team, their
loyalty and allegiance to God is never again an issue. What commentary
do you think verse 12 makes about that school of thought? What is the corporate responsibility of everyone
on the team? According to verse 14, how long do we need to hold
firmly our allegiance (confidence) to Christ? (Proverbs 11:3 NIV) The integrity of the upright guides
them, but the unfaithful are destroyed by their duplicity. What is the outcome for those who vacillate back and forth
with their allegiance? (Joshua 24:15 NIV) But if serving the LORD seems undesirable
to you, then choose for yourselves this day whom you will serve, whether
the gods your forefathers served beyond the River, or the gods of the
Amorites, in whose land you are living. But as for me and my household,
we will serve the LORD." What did Joshua say to the Israelites about vacillating
in their allegiance? (1 Kings 18:21 NIV) Elijah went before the people and
said, "How long will you waver between two opinions? If the LORD
is God, follow him; but if Baal is God, follow him." But the people
said nothing. What did Elijah say to the people about vacillating in their
allegiance? Bottom Line: Our allegiance to God is not something we can share with
anything else in our life
especially our sinful nature. The man in
the church at Corinth who was guilty of sexual immorality demonstrated
his allegiance was to his sin nature instead of God
certainly bad
enough all by itself! But Paul said his sin was not all by itself!
By allowing him to stay among them, even demonstrating they were proud
of this man, the people revealed a telltale sign of a shift in their allegiance
as well. Paul said if they did not throw this man out from among them,
the yeast of his malice and wickedness would spread through
the whole batch of them. Keep thy heart with all diligence; for out of it are
the issues of life. (Proverbs 4:23 KJV) Close With Prayer. |